Re: [apps-discuss] Apps-Review Team Review: draft-ietf-enum-iax-10

Bernie Hoeneisen <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch> Tue, 19 April 2011 10:22 UTC

Return-Path: <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61CE2E0738 for <apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 03:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j40B9mHPE-xF for <apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 03:22:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from softronics.hoeneisen.ch (softronics.hoeneisen.ch [62.2.86.178]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F7DE0731 for <Apps-Discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 03:22:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by softronics.hoeneisen.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>) id 1QC857-0001Iy-7r; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:22:53 +0200
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:22:53 +0200 (CEST)
From: Bernie Hoeneisen <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>
X-X-Sender: bhoeneis@softronics.hoeneisen.ch
To: Joseph Yee <jyee@afilias.info>
In-Reply-To: <E3A6FACA-4A62-499F-8264-DC2A5C585716@afilias.info>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1104191201521.4563@softronics.hoeneisen.ch>
References: <E3A6FACA-4A62-499F-8264-DC2A5C585716@afilias.info>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on softronics.hoeneisen.ch); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: klaus.darilion@nic.at, ed guy <edguy@CleverSpoke.com>, Jason Livingood <jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com>, Apps-Discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Apps-Review Team Review: draft-ietf-enum-iax-10
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 10:22:52 -0000

Hi Joseph

Thanks for your review and feedback on draft-ietf-enum-iax-10.
My comments inline.


On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, Joseph Yee wrote:

> Nits:
>   (1)
>   In Section 5, IANA Considerations, words suggested to make registration type more specific
>
>   Original
>   This document requests registration of the 'iax' Enumservice
>   according....
>
>   Suggestion
>   This document requests registration of the Enumservice
>   Type 'iax' according.....

Could be changed, although IMHO not really needed.


>   (2)
>   In Section 5, IANA Considerations, specifications reference should include RFC6116
>
>   Original
>   according to the guidelines and specifications in [RFC6117]
>   and the definitions in Section 2 in this document.
>
>   Suggestion
>   according to the guidelines and specifications in [RFC6117],
>   [RFC6116] and the definitions in Section 2 in this document.


Adding a reference to RFC 6116 just confuses the reader, as RFC 6116 does 
not contain any specifications concerning IANA registration. When we 
revised RFC 3761, we purposly made a split between ENUM (as protocol) and 
the Enumservices (IANA registration, process).
(A reader who tries to find IANA Enumservices related content in RFC 6116 
due to such a reference will be disappointed, as all he finds is a 
reference to RFC 6117.)

Therefore, a reference to RFC 6116 to the IANA considerations section 
of draft-ietf-enum-iax should not be added.

cheers,
  Bernie (document shephard of draft-ietf-enum-iax & author of RFC 6117)

PS: I added Jason (the designated Expert for this document) to the Cc.

--

http://ucom.ch/
Tech Consulting for Internet Standardization