Re: [apps-discuss] 'Base' and 'Content-Base' header fields
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Mon, 29 August 2011 18:43 UTC
Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 286E721F8CBD for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:43:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.539
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.539 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id inrg2g+6zLA8 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:43:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D9C21F8CC0 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:43:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by malice.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.71]) with mapi; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:45:13 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: Apps-discuss list <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:45:12 -0700
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] 'Base' and 'Content-Base' header fields
Thread-Index: AcxmY/xlIngB77p2SteDx5vGUcRnpQAF4WdA
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DF954@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <4E5BB666.60903@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E5BB666.60903@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] 'Base' and 'Content-Base' header fields
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:43:49 -0000
> -----Original Message----- > From: apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mykyta Yevstifeyev > Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 8:55 AM > To: Apps-discuss list > Subject: [apps-discuss] 'Base' and 'Content-Base' header fields > > So, you see, 'Content-Base' is in the rather uncertain state, and no > clear definition is available. (This reminds me of 'Link' header field, > which was in rather the same state.) So, is there enough support to > undertake the effort to define 'Content-Base' field properly? Does anything actually use this, or is it just something that got dropped in the specs along the way? Or perhaps more simply: What problem are you trying to solve? If it's not in widespread use, I imagine there's no pressing need to "fix" it. -MSK
- [apps-discuss] 'Base' and 'Content-Base' header f… Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [apps-discuss] 'Base' and 'Content-Base' head… Frank Ellermann
- Re: [apps-discuss] 'Base' and 'Content-Base' head… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] 'Base' and 'Content-Base' head… SM
- Re: [apps-discuss] 'Base' and 'Content-Base' head… Frank Ellermann
- Re: [apps-discuss] 'Base' and 'Content-Base' head… Mark Nottingham