Re: [apps-discuss] FW: Spam reporting over IMAP

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Tue, 24 January 2012 06:05 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 792C821F85B8 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:05:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.587
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.587 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.012, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LN2r7dEgDOEP for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:05:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E1F21F85AA for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:05:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from malice.corp.cloudmark.com (172.22.10.71) by exch-htcas901.corp.cloudmark.com (172.22.10.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:05:29 -0800
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by malice.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.71]) with mapi; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:05:29 -0800
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:05:28 -0800
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] FW: Spam reporting over IMAP
Thread-Index: AczO/5w0zIm+SpJ7RGmLza1UzvIy+ADJcaFQADFelgAACKZQAAC4je8QAD4ANWAA3Trh8A==
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C9A7D969@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <1DE983233DBBEB4A81F18FABD8208D76226DA413@XMB107ACNC.rim.net>
In-Reply-To: <1DE983233DBBEB4A81F18FABD8208D76226DA413@XMB107ACNC.rim.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] FW: Spam reporting over IMAP
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:05:31 -0000

Hi all,

Going back through the thread discussing this work proposed to APPSAWG, I've seen a couple of people willing to do work on it so long as there's some evidence it will go somewhere on the Internet side of things.

Accordingly, I've sent messages to contacts inside several of the big mailbox providers to ask if they would be interested in a spam reporting extension to IMAP.  I'll report back anything I get from them.  Perhaps then we can formulate a formal reply to OMA one way or the other.

-MSK (OMA Liaison Manager)