IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Updating the status of SPF

Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com> Wed, 10 August 2011 03:37 UTC

Return-Path: <scott@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7B43228012 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 20:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zNoQPyB88HDQ for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 20:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout00.controlledmail.com (mailout00.controlledmail.com [72.81.252.19]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A1B228011 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 20:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout00.controlledmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout00.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6025B38C12D; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 23:37:40 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=2007-00; t=1312947460; bh=x/dfmrnlnx3fYd6iP4Y7j58Kbgxhej8EjiXwObMlhpk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id; b=aYrNDcSGhmQwusSJa/3H2d2IJvQLLlviK0I2kAz8mZIhPBHDeXROX0p/tscn8cZXF +IwK5eq78FvtDVttichtGKrqyfKLIVFMquczLYgPR6HQKsKUiyTll6H1FpzzOFdeGI lgD7kVSOiOaHGfW1/2HxFmtkFwZ/zWK7bKqnSJI4=
From: Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 23:37:39 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-10-generic-pae; KDE/4.6.2; i686; ; )
References: <AcxV+CxT9WxP2wTLTNWpQ3LXOor+nw==> <4E4112B4.7000905@tana.it> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DF642@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DF642@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201108092337.39408.scott@kitterman.com>
X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Updating the status of SPF
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 03:37:11 -0000

On Tuesday, August 09, 2011 01:19:58 PM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
> > [mailto:apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alessandro Vesely
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 3:58 AM
> > To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Updating the status of SPF
> > 
> > +1, this is a Good Thing to do!
> 
> Does that mean you (all) are volunteering to review stuff and comment, and
> possibly co-chair?

I've already started locally looking at what changes need to be made in RFC 
and updating the draft.  There are a few errata, but I doubt there is a lot to 
do.  

If a full working group is needed, I'm willing to work in any role (in 
addition to co-authoring) if the group is suitably chartered.  I've also had 
informal discussions with one of the RFC 4408 co-authors that is willing to 
also work on 4408bis.

Scott K

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status