Re: [apps-discuss] draft-yevstifeyev-pop-wrong-state
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Tue, 23 August 2011 16:59 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29BC221F8B8A for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:59:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.032
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.032 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.055, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AWaSVZPDxRMk for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:59:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yi0-f44.google.com (mail-yi0-f44.google.com [209.85.218.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A384E21F8B7F for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:59:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yie12 with SMTP id 12so290144yie.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 10:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=5vNGxWc4nGGfBjn19wxlWO/zBTadE4G+AIYgMEWJxNI=; b=LnR0IOizhnmpyzR+5LCMZsiMA+EUtjiCCWxtyyG2UPD2lj+fMkXaR5ApE0I8zjnjzw Y4sNLoG44cJmDX/hEeSnv1uQMrMLzLgE2Uh1yQnPY1pQKDAort0XgjccGeWBWtNuVrSe 07GJfXQoEmY85xtjpni2FmAvmAZHo97ahklj8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.72.169 with SMTP id t29mr24593002yhd.110.1314118829711; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 10:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.147.181.13 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 10:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E513FDB.7090000@qualcomm.com>
References: <4E513FDB.7090000@qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 13:00:29 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: JESv_wO81ZHA1M4l_5koHK3k6YY
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVARftBraeZNduQyu642g-czyujQVmYhrpwNZ+i1_vPjMQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] draft-yevstifeyev-pop-wrong-state
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:59:22 -0000
> 1. Is there significant interest in implementing this POP response code > extension? I ask because, if there is, it might be more appropriate to bring > this into some Applications working group. I can't imagine that there'll be a lot of interest. POP clients and servers have been interoperating well for a good many years without this response code, and I don't see folks lining up to rev their code for something that basically amounts to servers helping new clients debug their bad implementations. > 2. If there isn't widespread interest, does anyone see any harm in this > being published as Experimental in the Independent stream? It seems to me a > very simple extension with little significant impact. It appears to me to be fairly useless, but totally harmless. I think it's a waste of time, but I otherwise have no objection to it. Barry
- [apps-discuss] draft-yevstifeyev-pop-wrong-state Pete Resnick
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-yevstifeyev-pop-wrong-st… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] draft-yevstifeyev-pop-wrong-st… Chris Newman