Re: [apps-discuss] Call for adoption of draft-kucherawy-mta-malformed-00.txt as an APPSAWG document

Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:

> Is it going to result in something?

Yes, this is still on my to do list. I am being slow.

> Mykyta
>
> 21.04.2011 0:38, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>
>> Dear APPSAWG participants,
>> There has been an active discussion about the document this week. 
>> Given that, I would like to ask the following questions:
>>
>> 1). Who is willing to review and post comments on the document if the 
>> WG accepts this document as a WG document?
>>
>> 2). Are there any objections to accepting this document as a WG 
>> document?
>>
>> If you have an objection, please be explicit about the nature of the 
>> objection (for example, if you think the document is harmful and 
>> shouldn't be worked on). Note that just saying that you don't like 
>> the document is not a good enough reason without further explanation.
>>
>> Explicit statements in favor of accepting are welcomed as well. But 
>> please also respond if you find objections by others to be 
>> objectionable ;-).
>>
>> You can send both objections and your statements of support directly 
>> to me (if you wish) or to the mailing list.
>>
>> Please send your responses by the end of April 29th.
>>
>> Alexey,
>> as an APPSAWG co-chair
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss

-- 
Internet Messaging Team Lead, <http://www.isode.com>
JID: same as my email address
twitter: aamelnikov