Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: RFC 6449 on Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Thu, 17 November 2011 06:23 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1FDF11E8133 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:23:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.307
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.292, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MSNmgQNQGB10 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:23:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294D911E8130 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:23:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by malice.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.71]) with mapi; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:23:35 -0800
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: apps-discuss Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:23:34 -0800
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] Fwd: RFC 6449 on Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations
Thread-Index: Acyk8I/KgEDKto9fT3ChlROc1b5r5gAAMzzA
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C150D8@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <20111117045856.117E6B1E003@rfc-editor.org> <B2896927-475F-41A7-8D87-336B672A4D9B@vpnc.org> <4EC4A6E0.6000503@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <4EC4A6E0.6000503@stpeter.im>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: RFC 6449 on Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 06:23:42 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Peter Saint-Andre
> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 10:17 PM
> To: Paul Hoffman
> Cc: apps-discuss Discuss
> Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: RFC 6449 on Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations
> 
> Good work. Congratulations to all involved.

+1.  And that's perhaps the biggest "+1" I've ever dropped.