IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] draft-nottingham-json-home-02

Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu> Tue, 30 April 2013 04:56 UTC

Return-Path: <dret@berkeley.edu>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7742D21F9A3E for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 21:56:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9TYkFAEfrz7b for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 21:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cm04fe.IST.Berkeley.EDU (cm04fe.IST.Berkeley.EDU [169.229.218.145]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26EAD21F99DB for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 21:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobile-166-147-108-028.mycingular.net ([166.147.108.28] helo=dretair.local) by cm04fe.ist.berkeley.edu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (auth plain:dret@berkeley.edu) (envelope-from <dret@berkeley.edu>) id 1UX2bq-0007V5-Fk; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 21:56:13 -0700
Message-ID: <517F4EE2.3090002@berkeley.edu>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 21:56:02 -0700
From: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org application-layer protocols" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
References: <CAOp_J8nfdqTxXJA8siTyhjTaxuhGYs9wWTMuFu2hCe6mccTQig@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOp_J8nfdqTxXJA8siTyhjTaxuhGYs9wWTMuFu2hCe6mccTQig@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] draft-nottingham-json-home-02
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 04:56:18 -0000

hello ted.

On 2013-04-29 15:36 , Ted M. Young [@jitterted] wrote:
> I see that this draft has expired. Is there an -03 coming up (I see it
> in your github)? We're implementing it in a RESTful experiment and it'd
> be nice if it were still considered active (not that expiration would
> stop us for this experiment).

we're implementing -02 as well, and -03 hopefully isn't too far away.

> Also, I've been trying to find if there's been discussion around the
> name of the media type, i.e., /json-home vs. /home+json. I don't want to
> beat a dead horse if this has already been discussed and the reasons
> explained.

as mark said, it probably will end up following the new suffix 
convention. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wilde-home-xml is the XML 
version of the same model (it is supposed to be in sync with the current 
JSON-based spec), and uses application/home+xml as media type.

cheers,

dret.

-- 
erik wilde | mailto:dret@berkeley.edu  -  tel:+1-510-2061079 |
            | UC Berkeley  -  School of Information (ISchool) |
            | http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret |

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email