[apps-discuss] Call for adoption of draft-kucherawy-mta-malformed-00.txt as an APPSAWG document

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Wed, 20 April 2011 21:39 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D4CE075D for <apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.509
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.090, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xMcOVwpQSfhy for <apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:39:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38035E06DE for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:39:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.124] ((unknown) [62.3.217.253]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <Ta9ShQBK46tT@rufus.isode.com>; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 22:39:18 +0100
X-SMTP-Protocol-Errors: NORDNS
Message-ID: <4DAF5256.2040303@isode.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 22:38:30 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [apps-discuss] Call for adoption of draft-kucherawy-mta-malformed-00.txt as an APPSAWG document
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 21:39:20 -0000

Dear APPSAWG participants,
There has been an active discussion about the document this week. Given 
that, I would like to ask the following questions:

1). Who is willing to review and post comments on the document if the WG 
accepts this document as a WG document?

2). Are there any objections to accepting this document as a WG document?

If you have an objection, please be explicit about the nature of the 
objection (for example, if you think the document is harmful and 
shouldn't be worked on). Note that just saying that you don't like the 
document is not a good enough reason without further explanation.

Explicit statements in favor of accepting are welcomed as well. But 
please also respond if you find objections by others to be objectionable 
;-).

You can send both objections and your statements of support directly to 
me (if you wish) or to the mailing list.

Please send your responses by the end of April 29th.

Alexey,
as an APPSAWG co-chair

-- 
Internet Messaging Team Lead, <http://www.isode.com>
JID: same as my email address
twitter: aamelnikov