Re: [apps-discuss] The state of 'afs' URi scheme

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 01 February 2011 15:50 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B888A3A6E50 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 07:50:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -111.084
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-111.084 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.115, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DZYl1htNziWM for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 07:50:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [64.57.183.53]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011533A6E47 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 07:50:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 39502 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2011 15:53:45 -0000
Received: from mail1.iecc.com (64.57.183.56) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 1 Feb 2011 15:53:45 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=14440.4d482c89.k1102; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=SM+m2NSZIRY8fuQvGrrMSSRMh866dkB16wNWAXmz2cI=; b=CSQF9ovhxvvz2fVokv/xhphkBo8U7sihB4rViTeWwv+KBiKIYuwHgRlMbOQ551IMFlBRIOBkKrff/f4OfoYrtLp9rz2NDOebEO4JBPfGbfOQhS1PEyf0YFcsodkTSVRAYZsjkqJLdcpxwQkoIo+XIjp9buUvuZVuxl6tXBURGXk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=14440.4d482c89.k1102; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=SM+m2NSZIRY8fuQvGrrMSSRMh866dkB16wNWAXmz2cI=; b=gG7/JkpY392VUaakt1xoGxtVT/i1gHf8/0iNE011EDyuAP8UNrKsBvz1OhcfEytJYEliayrA88XREgDmSVf9EKO28C3bIcFYyH3eUhlHwjPG2BguvtByimXGlNb8664y0JhvFRTc/W8I/kuF1u+B/IyEFsUKptgJm40A1he6amo=
VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org
Date: 1 Feb 2011 15:53:45 -0000
Message-ID: <20110201155345.83007.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=pavQU+R1Ti=SpitwUga8WuTcrZ3G9oK4zGm6P@mail.gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Cc: barryleiba@computer.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] The state of 'afs' URi scheme
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:50:30 -0000

>This is like that.  Let's not waste everyone's time.
>In fact, let's not waste any more time discussing it.

I certainly see rough consensus (everyone except one) that there is
nothing to do here.  So I encourage people to resist the urge to
debate it further.

R's,
John