Re: [apps-discuss] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6365 (2966)

Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com> Sun, 11 September 2011 06:11 UTC

Return-Path: <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6582D21F8514 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:11:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.954
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.954 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.145, BAYES_00=-2.599, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9ffTllPeC6dB for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com (mail-pz0-f45.google.com [209.85.210.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15AF721F84DB for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:11:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so17473250pzk.18 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IGUxFgf/Iw6DcRSrVDNOvkDzs+vd7jTEEGQdSa8t6G0=; b=DQKdN6djpAGpmRyFqNpQMJ9LSGpZr5z1TrZsJQYU5PsfD5+ChMN3EuY6xGJWt+A4am mZ1ku7xB9ozP8L+icYa0dolR6RElPa1/XPwO+EiJ0AaFybH/LTdFVXgb8J/Da3Pt8KI9 1LEGuX9RJofwapFoCtGiJGGfmhMZMO0OZ4Gcw=
Received: by 10.68.1.35 with SMTP id 3mr2490236pbj.247.1315721603108; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.101.15 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:12:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20110910171642.087ae4b8@resistor.net>
References: <20110910083446.7D45098C251@rfc-editor.org> <8FDDE9E59CF60C43C95F3951@PST.JCK.COM> <CAHhFybpw36MXJJaNA+-EZLUmXgWuxd7WRgkWr0F6RbLci+YJOg@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20110910171642.087ae4b8@resistor.net>
From: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 08:12:43 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHhFybrW-NKrkWTcihxCUnwcEmq0nUGTaW8NTdWG8F1N6e1+YQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6365 (2966)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 06:11:35 -0000

On 11 September 2011 02:31, SM quoted:

> "Unfortunately, our understanding of the errata problem was wrong
>  in several ways.  The number of errors reported turned out to be
>  significantly greater than anticipated"

IMHO the process works much better now.

> draft-rfc-editor-errata-process-02

The [IESG-Err-Proc] reference in this draft matches the page at
<http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/errata-processing.html>, and
in this statement "Hold for Document Update" is almost literally
the same as "archived" in the rfc-editor-errata-process draft.

If that is unrelated to what you wanted to say I need a new clue;
especially, why did you mention Stéphane's RFC 3536 blog entry?

-Frank