Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-levine-trace-header-registry-01.txt

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 23 January 2012 17:14 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6683921F8664 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:14:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -108.664
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-108.664 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.535, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4VSbNuwb5PWa for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:14:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD5BD21F865F for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:14:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 22326 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2012 17:14:39 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 23 Jan 2012 17:14:39 -0000
Date: 23 Jan 2012 17:14:17 -0000
Message-ID: <20120123171417.44531.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C9A7D930@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-levine-trace-header-registry-01.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:14:40 -0000

>In order to avoid having this document mired in the "should" vs. "SHOULD" discussion, the
>authors here might want to consider just listing the drafts that ask for trace field status
>rather than making direct citations.

SM suggested adding a note saying that the section is quoting text
from existing RFCs, and any 2119 words in this section mean whatever
they meant in the original RFCs.  Seems reasonable to me.

R's,
John