IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Malformed mail (was Re: Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail-03)

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Fri, 28 June 2013 03:22 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C65821F89A6 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FmXYr+FFF5Q2 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:22:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F328021F9CC6 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:22:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.116] (cpe-76-93-143-183.san.res.rr.com [76.93.143.183]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r5S3MThF030767 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:22:32 -0700
Message-ID: <51CD016E.6020109@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:22:22 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
References: <20130628004852.77149.qmail@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20130628004852.77149.qmail@joyce.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.66]); Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: barryleiba@computer.org, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Malformed mail (was Re: Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail-03)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 03:22:54 -0000

On 6/27/2013 5:48 PM, John Levine wrote:
> In article <CAC4RtVCJOrmQBMzRUNSBpjqUJZtYEFKUVL+Bi85bB2=Oi9tLuQ@mail.gmail.com> you write:
>>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 9-bit
>>
>> NINE-bit?  Oy.
>
> You got something against Multics?


IASTR Tenex could do that, too.

d/


-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status