Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback on draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-00

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Thu, 01 March 2012 22:09 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E0821E8018 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:09:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.604
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.604 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.005, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8R3qSQGkazn2 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:09:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27EC621E82BA for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:09:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EXCH-MBX901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::addf:849a:f71c:4a82]) by EXCH-HTCAS901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::2966:6846:8d89:4681%12]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:09:01 -0800
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] Feedback on draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-00
Thread-Index: AQHM9+d/ykpyZt+42kKhe+gEF12z9JZV4QswgACHTwCAAALmAIAAFMUA//99OaCAAIiGAP//eg5w
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 22:09:00 +0000
Message-ID: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392806FDD8@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <4F4FD7EB.8080004@cloudmark.com> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392806FAA0@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <4F4FDA86.4040506@cloudmark.com> <4F4FDCF4.2000107@gmx.de> <1330638432.2531.12.camel@neutron> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392806FDBB@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <4F4FF332.2080900@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <4F4FF332.2080900@gmx.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.20.2.121]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback on draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-00
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 22:09:02 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de]
> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 2:08 PM
> To: Murray S. Kucherawy
> Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback on draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-00
> 
> It doesn't use "Internet-Draft" as seriesInfo, and thus doesn't produce
> the "work in progress" label.

Is that seriesInfo the thing that makes "(work in progress)" appear?

> (yes, I'm nitpicking here)

Indeed.  :-)