Re: [apps-discuss] "X-" revisited

Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> Wed, 29 June 2011 02:32 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F1011E812B for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B-ZIPmBGlbd8 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail119.messagelabs.com (mail119.messagelabs.com [216.82.241.195]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE2211E8129 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: tony@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-5.tower-119.messagelabs.com!1309314768!26548988!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.17; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.20.145]
Received: (qmail 29234 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2011 02:32:49 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp6.sbc.com (HELO mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) (144.160.20.145) by server-5.tower-119.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 29 Jun 2011 02:32:49 -0000
Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5T2XDE9032037 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:33:13 -0400
Received: from alpd052.aldc.att.com (alpd052.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5T2X9vb031979 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:33:10 -0400
Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5T2Wis3011545 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:32:44 -0400
Received: from dns.maillennium.att.com (dns.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5T2WZwJ011388 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:32:36 -0400
Received: from [135.70.35.38] (vpn-135-70-35-38.vpn.west.att.com[135.70.35.38]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20110629023234gw100e4lhpe> (Authid: tony); Wed, 29 Jun 2011 02:32:35 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.70.35.38]
Message-ID: <4E0A8EC0.6080509@att.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:32:32 -0400
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
References: <4E08CDCB.70902@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <4E08CDCB.70902@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] "X-" revisited
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 02:32:50 -0000

I think it's worth mentioning the use of the VND.domain.name, PRS and 
reversed.domain.name namespace prefixes as alternative mechanisms that 
*have* worked well in other protocols.

This way the reader isn't left wondering "okay, I've been told what 
*not* to do and *why* I shouldn't do it, but what *should* I do instead?"

     Tony Hansen
     tony@att.com

On 6/27/2011 2:36 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Based on comments received to date, I've published a heavily-revised
> version of the "X-" proposal:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-saintandre-xdash-00.txt
>
> Further feedback is welcome