Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-yevstifeyev-ftp-uri-scheme-04.txt

Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com> Fri, 08 July 2011 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2042F21F8CD8 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 12:29:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.039
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.039 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EyWjoPKsMcav for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 12:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pv0-f172.google.com (mail-pv0-f172.google.com [74.125.83.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953DC21F8CC5 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 12:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pvh18 with SMTP id 18so1847352pvh.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jGs0qRDyh/ncTLBGgsmRqwAvFnXyq3iWCTKdL7mqX3c=; b=FWX/QBwL6ZugcHBus6k3t236AJuUpdA7PhFN7vG2o0z2DAlyZvkAGFH6acKaZt7PVM vfzAjMf3lkeB6MXBaG8QdaZ+kMDK/BVgDLA22Ct6nx5Zx/ConQPM8smHf3KhAe6Gkspy 6lbwKB0IGTIwZFLzzbIRN/Cg/i7DhbxadvqMA=
Received: by 10.142.120.39 with SMTP id s39mr476267wfc.237.1310153365113; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.88.9 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 12:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <C3E9EF6E0154D73656D30639@PST.JCK.COM>
References: <4E15C895.6020701@gmail.com> <CAHhFybq563a9+ivYuk83J3po_02nopeiu=mB3fO26f-o1Mwt0A@mail.gmail.com> <C3E9EF6E0154D73656D30639@PST.JCK.COM>
From: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 21:29:05 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHhFybq4x1hVVhoSA=ZAV890ARYyqRMpGScAbrv4LxB0wZjrkg@mail.gmail.com>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: URI <uri@w3.org>, Apps-discuss list <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-yevstifeyev-ftp-uri-scheme-04.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 19:29:26 -0000

On 8 July 2011 19:46, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:

>> The anonymous:mail construct is also not more state of the art
>> for privacy reasons, unless it is a mail address in TLD invalid
>> or similar.

> Disagree.  If I'm an FTP repository provider, I can ask you to
> give up your email address in return for service if I want to.
> Whether I trust the address you give me is another matter, but
> that isn't a privacy issue.

Your server, your rules.  Nevertheless user agents such as web
browsers MUST NOT use valuable email accounts in anonymous FTP
connections without explicit consent of the user.  I don't think
that address harvesting by spammers on anonymous FTP servers is a
serious threat, but "anonymous" should be what the name says, as
long as the user didn't explicitly set something else.

If your FTP server does not accept anonymous:me@privacy.invalid
it is fine, I'd know how to use another FTP client where I can
add one of the addresses you know.  But exactly these addresses
should not be used in anonymous connections with arbitrary FTP
servers, unless I explicitly confirmed it for a given server.

-Frank