Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft

Simon Tyler <styler@mimecast.com> Fri, 15 April 2011 17:26 UTC

Return-Path: <styler@mimecast.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F38813002E for <apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j+nvSYK8XDnW for <apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:26:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from serviceB.mimecast.com (serviceb.mimecast.com [195.130.217.19]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E277E0698 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:26:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from remote.mimecast.com (146.101.202.133 [146.101.202.133]) (Using TLS) by serviceB.mimecast.com; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:26:10 +0100
Received: from MC-LON-EXCH02.mcsltd.internal ([::1]) by MC-LON-EXCH02.mcsltd.internal ([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0255.000; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:26:09 +0100
From: Simon Tyler <styler@mimecast.com>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Thread-Index: Acv6ioaMMlVzZylWW0aABPApC7cyaQATJ3GgACMOAgAAAyIhgAAFBToAAAAf5AAAADuaAAAAEGQAAAMh1YA=
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 17:26:08 +0000
Message-ID: <C9CE3E39.7663%styler@mimecast.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DA878B4.9060007@dcrocker.net>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.9.0.110114
x-originating-ip: [86.165.30.192]
Content-ID: <6010F71055EEE54B81E61BA19BBD318F@mimecast.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MC-Unique: 111041518261000201
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 17:26:12 -0000

> 
> 
> On 4/15/2011 9:54 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
>> I've heard the suggestion of LWP - Least Worst Practise - before.
> 
> 
> I like that /much/ better than what I suggested.  Concise, accurate and
> appropriately apologetic.

I like this to. It sums it all perfectly - there is no right solution to
most of these problems. A best practise implies goodness. A least worst
practise implies the minimum badness which is eactly the problem.

Simon