IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] [http-auth] HTTP-Auth BoF in Quebec City Postponed

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 04 October 2011 19:34 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F9421F8F7A; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:34:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.655
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.655 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.056, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XFyO-J52jodM; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DF321F8F74; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-178.cisco.com (unknown [64.101.72.178]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67178E84C9; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:42:05 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4E8B608E.3030400@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:37:50 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
References: <5FA6AD59-7570-4A85-B6D1-3DC8E42688F1@mnot.net> <234F16BC-9875-474B-95B3-D61E8BE5A6E0@checkpoint.com> <CAK3OfOigCA1Jkv6qgc+kF-43Bavgxdv-twVs6au+B3qWWsbDvA@mail.gmail.com> <4E2CA293.70603@stpeter.im> <CAGipQFmN89+Q26AGsocnWbh1nzcH0xgJAC8oZOYVw-cn1L9mGw@mail.gmail.com> <CAK3OfOj5hDQrR3GWY468OHgTKXe3e6ihq1UGENJVgg7V+LpMxA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAK3OfOj5hDQrR3GWY468OHgTKXe3e6ihq1UGENJVgg7V+LpMxA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>, "http-auth@ietf.org" <http-auth@ietf.org>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org Discuss" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] [http-auth] HTTP-Auth BoF in Quebec City Postponed
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 19:34:47 -0000

On 10/4/11 12:55 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 12:43 AM, HAYASHI, Tatsuya
> <lef.mutualauth@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The cut-off date of BOF proposal requests in IETF Taipei is coming soon.
>> Taking account of the recent status of this list, I don't think we
>> have a BOF in Taipei. However, I want to improve the authentication in
>> the web too, so is there any intention to have a side meeting to
>> clarify the scope and the problem?
>>
>> As a co-author of the problem statement draft by Yutaka Oiwa, I want
>> the draft enhanced by other guys familiar with authentication.
>> (We are updating a draft!)
> 
> We agreed at Quebec not to have a meeting at Taipei.  I thought we all
> agreed that it would be counter-productive to have such a meeting with
> a significant constituency absent.
> 
> What's changed since Quebec?

We agreed not to hold a BoF. I see no particular harm in a little side
meeting if folks are interested.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email