Re: [apps-discuss] more feature requests, was: JSON patch: "test" operation
Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net> Fri, 30 December 2011 14:06 UTC
Return-Path: <samj@samj.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id F38FA21F8BE5 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 30 Dec 2011 06:06:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.278,
BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DXS-+UC0tccO for
<apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 06:06:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eu1sys200aog109.obsmtp.com (eu1sys200aog109.obsmtp.com
[207.126.144.127]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6652721F8BDC for
<apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 06:06:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.213.41]) (using TLSv1) by
eu1sys200aob109.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID
DSNKTv3FSUZeEAR7BmTOUR/ahVtnayhP5oSs@postini.com;
Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:06:19 UTC
Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so7641916yhg.0 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>;
Fri, 30 Dec 2011 06:06:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.236.128.197 with SMTP id f45mr50910316yhi.44.1325253960408;
Fri, 30 Dec 2011 06:06:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.143.100 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 06:05:39 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4EFDAABF.7020804@gmx.de>
References: <4ED64A26.5030003@gmx.de>
<BC564D94-6D00-4D63-863A-8AAD00E57B3A@tzi.org> <4ED77513.3070506@gmx.de>
<6E443D75-D1AC-451F-9B17-115C9A6C7696@mnot.net> <4ED7F8C2.9030804@gmx.de>
<37E09A53-E9F4-45D2-BB8F-79655BECDBB2@mnot.net>
<1322779521.1958.1.camel@neutron> <4EFC8A08.7000105@gmx.de>
<1325222688.18477.25.camel@neutron>
<CAKTR03_GdgdTwJF073uV1iUGSEW1E6wXxO-OtYpWReARBhRMgQ@mail.gmail.com>
<4EFD954B.3090006@gmx.de>
<CAKTR03_XZOW3HK4MLjG8n+-SmCBp68Zym4S-g6vj3NXa-=kHfQ@mail.gmail.com>
<4EFDAABF.7020804@gmx.de>
From: Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 15:05:39 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKTR039MLM=QKo0xOJewbVqspuTpm82z_wSw3WF=CD9dao-a8g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf300fb37d8c1f0e04b54fbbfc
Cc: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] more feature requests,
was: JSON patch: "test" operation
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols
<apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>,
<mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>,
<mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:06:40 -0000
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>wrote;wrote: > On 2011-12-30 12:36, Sam Johnston wrote: > > ... > >> Of course that depends on how you define the lifetime of a resource. >> Does a resource which currently doesn't have a retrievable >> representation "exist"? >> >> Technically, PATCH can work for creating an initial mapping as well. >> >> That's a contrived interpretation — is it something we want to support? >> I'd rather a PATCH throw a 4xx error if a resource didn't exist... an >> empty PUT would create a resource that could then be PATCHed, no? >> ... >> > > It probably belongs into the description of the patch format. > Agreed. > I don't see how requiring an empty PUT makes things better, though. > It would prevent misplaced PATCHes from creating new resources, while still allowing you to build up a resource from scratch with PATCHes. Maybe I'm being pedantic, but I thought that's what standards groups were for ;) Sam
- [apps-discuss] JSON patch: "test" operation Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] JSON patch: "test" operation Paul C. Bryan
- Re: [apps-discuss] JSON patch: "test" operation mike amundsen
- Re: [apps-discuss] JSON patch: "test" operation TianLinyi
- Re: [apps-discuss] JSON patch: "test" operation Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] JSON patch: "test" operation Carsten Bormann
- Re: [apps-discuss] JSON patch: "test" operation Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] JSON patch: "test" operation Carsten Bormann
- Re: [apps-discuss] JSON patch: "test" operation Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] JSON patch: "test" operation Paul C. Bryan
- Re: [apps-discuss] JSON patch: "test" operation Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] JSON patch: "test" operation Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] JSON patch: "test" operation Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] JSON patch: "test" operation Paul C. Bryan
- [apps-discuss] more feature requests, was: JSON p… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] more feature requests, was: JS… Sam Johnston
- Re: [apps-discuss] more feature requests, was: JS… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] more feature requests, was: JS… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] more feature requests, was: JS… Paul C. Bryan
- Re: [apps-discuss] more feature requests, was: JS… Sam Johnston
- Re: [apps-discuss] more feature requests, was: JS… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] more feature requests, was: JS… Sam Johnston
- Re: [apps-discuss] more feature requests, was: JS… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] more feature requests, was: JS… Sam Johnston
- Re: [apps-discuss] more feature requests, was: JS… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] more feature requests, was: JS… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] more feature requests, was: JS… Paul C. Bryan
- Re: [apps-discuss] more feature requests, was: JS… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] more feature requests, was: JS… Paul C. Bryan
- Re: [apps-discuss] more feature requests, was: JS… Julian Reschke