Re: [apps-discuss] draft-saintandre-xdash-considered-harmful

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Fri, 03 June 2011 03:25 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB57E088B for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:25:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.052
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.052 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.453, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6RuphvUczapO for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A66E07EC for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chancetrain-lm.mnot.net (unknown [118.209.19.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0CE6A509B3; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:24:58 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <4DE85364.6030900@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 13:24:56 +1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C88E389F-57AD-4BEA-BCA5-94723BAF0380@mnot.net>
References: <321CAE57-EDC0-4DEE-801C-808FCBA36EF9@mnot.net> <4DE85364.6030900@stpeter.im>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org Discuss" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] draft-saintandre-xdash-considered-harmful
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 03:25:01 -0000

On 03/06/2011, at 1:22 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> On 6/2/11 9:13 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saintandre-xdash-considered-harmful-01>
>> 
>> Will this be progressing? I, for one, would like to see this as an BCP.
> 
> I'd be happy to bring it back to life

Please do. Happy to help.


> , although I admit that I've mostly
> forgotten about it and that I haven't yet addressed some of the feedback
> I received last year. Also, I think "harmful" might be a bit strong --
> "considered-useless" perhaps?


Not *quite* strong enough. "considered bad practice?"

Or just change the title to something more generic like "Appropriate use of X-".

Cheers,

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/