[apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-04.txt
Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Tue, 10 April 2012 12:55 UTC
Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C3D21F85DB for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 05:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.219
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.379, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YIttbMDySY7Y for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 05:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D6521F85D5 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 05:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1334062549; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=OEWIzuwxsmLtFk+oRH206iCs14xoTNxctqmFDFICXGE=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=nF9p69sSUD1jkJJV+nku5UKVBuc8ak8oOR07AgUGTJty/LSff/94N+ddQouoynQZwPyh+j GzEdXrw+6btPsKQewgEmBiKMw30k2y22VBtSs8LvPrL/+/tL+06uD6P+JPfCgSJx/3yfP6 2X/cvSOlmWKFaVTT9LK2NW8q9ghGKOc=;
Received: from [172.16.1.29] (shiny.isode.com [62.3.217.250]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <T4Qt1QAg2zUp@rufus.isode.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:55:49 +0100
X-SMTP-Protocol-Errors: PIPELINING
Message-ID: <4F842DFB.2060709@isode.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:56:27 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses.all@tools.ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020703080700020904000007"
Subject: [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-04.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:55:52 -0000
I have been selected as the Applications Area Directorate reviewer for this draft (for background on appsdir, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/ApplicationsAreaDirectorate).Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-04.txt Title: ConEx Concepts and Use Cases Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 10 April 2012 IETF Last Call Date: 12 April 2012 IESG Telechat Date: 12 April 2012 Review Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC. Document Summary: This document provides the entry point to the set of documentation about the Congestion Exposure (ConEx) protocol. It explains the motivation for including a ConEx marking at the IP layer: to expose information about congestion to network nodes. Although such information may have a number of uses, this document focuses on how the information communicated by the ConEx marking can serve as the basis for significantly more efficient and effective traffic management than what exists on the Internet today. I've already reviewed this document as a Gen-Art reviewer and have no new issues to report. I don't think the document has Apps Area issues.
- [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-conex… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-c… S Moonesamy