Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-nottingham-http-new-status-02.txt

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sat, 22 October 2011 07:53 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2B821F8B8E for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 00:53:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SFrx3chlYYZD for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 00:53:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 02DAA21F8B9E for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 00:53:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2011 07:53:49 -0000
Received: from p5DCC8207.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [93.204.130.7] by mail.gmx.net (mp052) with SMTP; 22 Oct 2011 09:53:49 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/KJZwVkIXK8YeZPfHqChfSBQ+S/aF420UIrGU1+N 4VVNO2F0OYJkov
Message-ID: <4EA27687.1040800@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:53:43 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
References: <20111018234005.22724.87290.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <FEB7C839-4210-4CC9-BD1F-8A9C53790BD4@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <FEB7C839-4210-4CC9-BD1F-8A9C53790BD4@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, Jan Algermissen <algermissen1971@me.com>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-nottingham-http-new-status-02.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 07:53:55 -0000

On 2011-10-19 01:57, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> FYI. Some adjustment of the status codes in -01, and one new one (thanks to Jan for the idea).
> ...

Looks good. Let's finish this.

One concern, one nit:

- it's suboptimal that we have an example of a Refresh header field with 
no spec for it (that could be worked around by making it a META tag in 
the response body)

- in appendix B, s/network filesystem access/remote authoring/.

Best regards, Julian