IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft

Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net> Fri, 15 April 2011 16:56 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A417713001A for <apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:56:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WM3CZ7Ua0YEJ for <apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EDF113005A for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.5] (adsl-67-127-56-68.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [67.127.56.68]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p3FGuPtm017613 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:56:30 -0700
Message-ID: <4DA878B4.9060007@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:56:20 -0700
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
References: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F1343319E22@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <CEDB17EC-80CE-49B5-91C1-FBCB0449BBA5@network-heretics.com> <4DA8542F.9040003@tana.it> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F1343319E51@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <4DA876B6.9050700@dcrocker.net> <3111.1302886470.781218@puncture>
In-Reply-To: <3111.1302886470.781218@puncture>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: ietf-822 <ietf-822@imc.org>, General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:56:36 -0000

On 4/15/2011 9:54 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> I've heard the suggestion of LWP - Least Worst Practise - before.


I like that /much/ better than what I suggested.  Concise, accurate and 
appropriately apologetic.

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email