Re: [apps-discuss] Apps Area Review Team Report for January 2011
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 01 February 2011 23:32 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1BD3A6DD8 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:32:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Clhzj2G8N0E6 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:32:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8ED3A6DCC for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:32:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from leavealone.cisco.com (72-163-0-129.cisco.com [72.163.0.129]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A57A400F6; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 16:52:34 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4D4898CF.6070702@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:35:43 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20110201151913.0aafb038@elandnews.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20110201151913.0aafb038@elandnews.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms030707050907000904010408"
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Apps Area Review Team Report for January 2011
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 23:32:30 -0000
On 2/1/11 4:29 PM, S Moonesamy wrote: > It would > be helpful to all parties if authors follow up on a review by posting a > reply to the apps-discuss mailing list. And it would be helpful for the ADs to ping the authors to that effect if needed, so I'll start doing that. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
- [apps-discuss] Apps Area Review Team Report for J… S Moonesamy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Apps Area Review Team Report f… Peter Saint-Andre