Re: [apps-discuss] 'Base' and 'Content-Base' header fields

Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com> Mon, 29 August 2011 20:04 UTC

Return-Path: <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10C6721F8C67 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:04:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.035
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.035 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.064, BAYES_00=-2.599, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Rfk4oG6YUiL for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gw0-f44.google.com (mail-gw0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8240521F8C54 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gwb20 with SMTP id 20so5967417gwb.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:05:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=MT0v02shpP/cRbBInlbZRHG4mVHPYPaBJq/MZBPcCpA=; b=jbJMXGyc2mjAr/Nmpz3jMWDTUvM/nd23P0ja8pcsIg1U1BT5f6uSFwvBrAW1USlQT2 YVuQQuziRL5RYBSjaPaBsKmpz26tuWjVNfLlG2EAUNrWO+4OAIxedr3pMAfW3jGfO/1F COsBYLuF5VR5IzC+SL5llmNz/rGTlO6dJR+w0=
Received: by 10.142.125.18 with SMTP id x18mr2705528wfc.412.1314648340179; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:05:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.98.5 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20110829115439.096409e0@resistor.net>
References: <4E5BB666.60903@gmail.com> <CAHhFybrZyJmvmZUjJtaOeSLRqkb-KPjki1TTy58ohEVAb9nQaw@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20110829115439.096409e0@resistor.net>
From: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 22:05:00 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHhFyboAz+ef7Cxg=MhdC8cWKqWqmRfvOLhxaUvP0zXhTr74yw@mail.gmail.com>
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: Apps-discuss list <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] 'Base' and 'Content-Base' header fields
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 20:04:16 -0000

On 29 August 2011 20:55, SM wrote:

>> Let's just fix the IANA registry
[...]
> It's easier to do that than to have yet another RFC.

Yes, done, there are now three registration templates
(Base: mime, Content-Base: mime, Content-Base: http)
for review on the ietf-message-headers@ietf list.  If
that is not as it should be for the HTTP header field
please fix/forward/discuss/... it.

-Frank