Re: [apps-discuss] apps-team review of draft-merrick-jms-uri-10

[S Moonesamy <[e-mail]>]

Hi Larry,

[I trimmed the Cc down to the Apps-discuss mailing list as the 
discussion is about process]

At 09:47 17-12-10, Larry Masinter wrote:
>I'm wondering if the process for review of registration material
>should include a provision for incorporation of reviewer comments
>(or a pointer to them) in the registry itself.

A registration request is generally reviewed on a mailing list 
dedicated for that purpose.  There is, for example, a Uri-review 
mailing list where URI schemes are discussed.   If the process for 
review requires the inclusion of material with reviewer comments, it 
is like writing an Internet-Draft to summarize the discussion.  This 
is akin to the Document Shepherding Process.  That output of that 
process rarely provides a summary of the views.

The registry documents the decision and not the pros and cons of the 
registration proposal.  That's its purpose.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy