Re: [apps-discuss] The state of 'afs' URi scheme

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 31 January 2011 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 022F53A6C01 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 07:08:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.115
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.115 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.516, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nuSwk5og9PmX for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 07:08:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 283193A6BFD for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 07:08:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2011 15:11:21 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.134]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp006) with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 16:11:21 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/ZCC5TjFrZ5HO2gF2LDhpiFmQ9h2JHTIzLXO/8t+ CVLqYezDAtqmf8
Message-ID: <4D46D118.6000403@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:11:20 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
References: %3C4D26B005.2060909@gmail.com%3E <4D2C7755.5080908@gmail.com> <81F42F63D5BB344ABF294F8E80990C7902782BBA@MTV-EXCHANGE.microfocus.com> <4D455380.6040103@gmail.com> <3792F8F3-D01B-4B05-9E73-59228F09FE5C@gbiv.com> <4D464EA4.7090303@gmail.com> <7ED44745-7DBA-4372-BE39-22061DC26DF2@gbiv.com> <4D46CE52.6030503@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <4D46CE52.6030503@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] The state of 'afs' URi scheme
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:08:11 -0000

On 31.01.2011 15:59, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> ...
> Mykyta, you are approximately the only person who seems to have a
> problem understanding that standards organizations like the IETF
> sometimes don't follow through on what they thought were good ideas and
> sometimes don't document that. Your response is to generate many useless
> efforts to clean up the IETF specs instead of just doing what everyone
> else does, which is to ask a question, find the answer, and move on. It
> feels like you are wasting lots of people's time for the benefit of no
> one other than maybe yourself. (If there are others who feel that
> Mykyta's efforts are worth our time, by all means speak up and I'm happy
> to back down here.)
> ...

+1

Speaking of which: there are URI schemes that *are* in use and should be 
registered (independently how "bad" we think they are); candidates are 
"itms" and "ical", which will probably require collaboration from Apple.

Best regards, Julian