IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg-received-state

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Sat, 09 June 2012 14:50 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95FC21F8691 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Jun 2012 07:50:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.984
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.984 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.008, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AEMKD9N6Iumy for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Jun 2012 07:50:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6F421F868A for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Jun 2012 07:50:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lagv3 with SMTP id v3so2777205lag.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 07:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Gp/gkJ6XbRBVJlyeGxTgF3Heqx2FiSlFBXRkT/e6l8k=; b=wPd6/OVzmyJ8/dZ8NVVpirYCgHtTJmBdv7vhitzEABcf8tZoCqlSYl9MSOQGHXezGt D/TLV+8sv317793r7ehZswUscbVcsyB+NfwU0MZm7UV5wrPvmBkq8udGd61LbLI32OnG cu/2NmHjJxLXcSwsyjlUasBTNfmBxxkH2YGyXVmUGdQzjUevnXo3h1kCEZxUvstpYq+j i3qeDzipDtULcBpVkho8A7tknSGA+5Q2lRfVAVQ7zf+ho3g4+biDp6DO6X7YfXK4cnok fgqXwwmVdis1wL++qwVsTwBNOo3q/SO6RQsacUUGorKHJOjRSYwKoOHNj2S+XSXi/iaz Zodg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.26.131 with SMTP id l3mr877643lbg.80.1339253421747; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 07:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.48.104 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Jun 2012 07:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <01OGGS87OI0Q000058@mauve.mrochek.com>
References: <CAL0qLwY1DCP9RY7cykwrPi48A_1h_FJUXo5eRWkn3Rw=rFXpBw@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVBuET9h-QHEtS=genmJnJ6bfKk=KD0bTJQvZJApAsY_ww@mail.gmail.com> <4FD08CA3.6080504@dcrocker.net> <01OGEZDG0T8M000058@mauve.mrochek.com> <4FD29DF5.5010206@dcrocker.net> <CAC4RtVAbC64Bx67b6OD4LApy9p_K2xqAZYGAETHxXZE5gY0-oA@mail.gmail.com> <01OGGS87OI0Q000058@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 10:50:21 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: SAO9wGsifaSOfmOyfQvyhJSFymE
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVBReXuj473yvkNt3nOL6AyEPkZpyjqgsd2-fF5SiFs_aQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec55555a477ae9504c20b3c97"
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg-received-state
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 14:50:24 -0000

On Saturday, June 9, 2012, Ned Freed wrote:
> As I said before, if the consensus is for FCFS, I'm willing to go along
since
> the number of this is likely to be small and so is the risk.

And so I'd like to hear from more people about this.  The document said
Specification Required, and we're talking about changing it to either
Expert Review or First Come First Served.  You've seen the arguments on
both sides so far, but we've only heard from me, Dave, and Ned.

Will others give opinions, please?

Barry

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status