[apps-discuss] draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation-03

Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com> Fri, 14 October 2011 20:50 UTC

Return-Path: <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E40121F8D3E for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.248, BAYES_00=-2.599, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gRxhp+EJogZT for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E55A21F8D3D for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wyg24 with SMTP id 24so3859480wyg.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=QRSuNFrD1HuHfALtaioGLyiNsSPMGnUum0Zp+p8pUQY=; b=WwWYWnOSONgsbkbg5U8U01p77vJ9VRf+D6QNNfXSKxQyHcrlPJPoSxW5a0FS+NUvkZ TlanUWuk8ohF8cwcX2x8B8Gi1obM0II3u5Hw11zdiBvADUsCamsik7Y8ficcHlHMaz2r Sdq0ebhTjvdFFB+dLEa4ctEM5oTWTaAVFeZhI=
Received: by 10.227.200.15 with SMTP id eu15mr3423357wbb.77.1318625404124; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.80.134 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:49:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 22:49:24 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHhFybovA_+-7CTA+k0ev7TBMyK_9UvEza8hpb-iEszB92Ep8A@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF Apps <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: [apps-discuss] draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation-03
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 20:50:06 -0000

Hi, I think the rel="canonical" is ready for a publication request.
Maybe something in section 5 at the end of point 1 is not yet as
it should be:

|1.  The content of the context URI is identical with, similar to, or
|    a subset of the content of the canonical."

-Frank