Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-yevstifeyev-ftp-uri-scheme-04.txt

Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com> Sat, 09 July 2011 10:58 UTC

Return-Path: <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFFD821F8767 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 03:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1n-nchuVDnXN for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 03:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8739121F86BC for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 03:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk5 with SMTP id 5so2707108pzk.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 03:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=5xfsPQxzTkxuk9xzCDtHTKPXBVRChmETRJbYp4X5sew=; b=ovZENZFbrIzqmvGBw151aQUenAJfNy4O9WusFE/7hrD/YrJUSfYnLi208BLN6N7oSo UButH2ejPaoC9mERx+oMiTbnpG+lQ1TZLa/m/CRt8YzLVaEpk77Q2RLa1kVDPpA2jCaI sKaeZ+G/8h9ScsTaenEH/e70y17wLySI3+n1s=
Received: by 10.142.135.13 with SMTP id i13mr827193wfd.408.1310209109149; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 03:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.88.9 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 03:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E17CC3C.8080308@gmail.com>
References: <4E15C895.6020701@gmail.com> <CAHhFybq563a9+ivYuk83J3po_02nopeiu=mB3fO26f-o1Mwt0A@mail.gmail.com> <4E17CC3C.8080308@gmail.com>
From: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 12:58:09 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHhFybpMkD3UEfOQ-VmXZ+g1ArY9gG0qSC-ZgFBL39+G_O_4HA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: URI <uri@w3.org>, Apps-discuss list <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-yevstifeyev-ftp-uri-scheme-04.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 10:58:30 -0000

On 9 July 2011 05:34, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:

Skipping the i18n and security considerations until I see
a new I-D one quick addition:

>> an unencoded "#" starts the fragment and is interpreted
>> (or ignored) by clients depending on the document.
[...]
> This will also be included in the draft.

Thanks.  My comment almost missed the point, the fragment
depends on the document <add> type, it does not depend on
the URI scheme </add>.  In the times of "hashbang URIs" it
might be necessary to be as clear as possible about this:

Fragments are one of the subtle differences between STD 66
and its predecessors (incl. RFC 1738).

For my privacy concerns pick something that does not upset
John or SM -- I'm almost sure that we want the same thing
from different points of view (server admin vs. FTP user,
with "popular" browsers hiding or not offering any choice).