Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback about "Update to MIME regarding Charset Parameter Handling in Textual Media Types"
"Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Wed, 29 February 2012 02:35 UTC
Return-Path: <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D533321E811A for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:35:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.908, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DtBZkyLqlUY6 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:35:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29CE321E806B for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:35:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.253.231]) by scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id q1T2Yx2h026054 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:34:59 +0900
Received: from (unknown [133.2.206.133]) by scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 55c5_68c7_f9a390c8_627d_11e1_a4f9_001d096c5782; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:34:59 +0900
Received: from [IPv6:::1] ([133.2.210.1]:58723) by itmail.it.aoyama.ac.jp with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id <S15A1894> for <apps-discuss@ietf.org> from <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:35:03 +0900
Message-ID: <4F4D8ED0.1030800@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:34:56 +0900
From: "\"Martin J. Dürst\"" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
References: <CAJQvAudekOKa2mzas-igD_6pa2je000Darin2HDNda-sk9TLCQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F4D581E.20503@gmx.de> <01OCJ7KAZHWG00ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com>
In-Reply-To: <01OCJ7KAZHWG00ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback about "Update to MIME regarding Charset Parameter Handling in Textual Media Types"
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 02:35:09 -0000
On 2012/02/29 11:19, Ned Freed wrote: >> Another change I want to do is to add to: > >> "New subtypes of the "text" media type, thus, SHOULD NOT define a >> default "charset" value. If there is a strong reason to do so despite >> this advice, they SHOULD use the "UTF-8" [RFC3629] charset as the >> default." > >> a sentence that if it's not UTF-8, it MUST be an ASCII-compatible >> encoding. > > I think that's a very good addition to make. Do we really, in this day and age, expect a new type to define an ASCII compatible encoding that's not UTF-8 as a default? If the MUST is some basic Mime requirement, then I don't see any reason to repeat it here. If it's not, then I don't see why it couldn't be UTF-16(LE|BE) or some such. In any case, I don't see why we need to be that specific, we are already outside a SHOULD NOT and then outside a SHOULD, and that isn't supposed to happen very often. Regards, Martin.
- [apps-discuss] Feedback about "Update to MIME reg… Henri Sivonen
- Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback about "Update to MIME… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback about "Update to MIME… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback about "Update to MIME… Henri Sivonen
- Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback about "Update to MIME… Henri Sivonen
- Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback about "Update to MIME… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback about "Update to MIME… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback about "Update to MIME… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback about "Update to MIME… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback about "Update to MIME… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback about "Update to MIME… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback about "Update to MIME… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback about "Update to MIME… Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback about "Update to MIME… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback about "Update to MIME… Henri Sivonen
- Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback about "Update to MIME… Henri Sivonen