IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Apps Area Review of draft-ietf-behave-lsn-requirements-05

Shin Miyakawa <miyakawa@nttv6.jp> Fri, 16 December 2011 07:00 UTC

Return-Path: <miyakawa@nttv6.jp>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D7B421F84A0; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 23:00:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.556
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.044, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dBp9buFWDNa2; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 23:00:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from guri.nttv6.jp (guri.nttv6.jp [IPv6:2402:c800:ff06:144::148]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB8921F84AE; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 23:00:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from z.nttv6.jp (z.nttv6.jp [IPv6:2402:c800:ff06:208::212]) by guri.nttv6.jp (NTTv6MTA) with ESMTP id AF985BDC20; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 16:00:00 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by z.nttv6.jp (NTTv6MTA) with ESMTP id 862D2704FB; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:59:58 +0900 (JST)
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:59:58 +0900
Message-Id: <20111216.155958.347221570.miyakawa@nttv6.jp>
To: lear@cisco.com
From: Shin Miyakawa <miyakawa@nttv6.jp>
In-Reply-To: <4EEAE8A7.70502@cisco.com>
References: <4EEA34FC.30008@viagenie.ca> <20111216.112649.193767691.miyakawa@nttv6.jp> <4EEAE8A7.70502@cisco.com>
Organizaton: NTT Communications
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.2 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: draft-ietf-behave-lsn-requirements.all@tools.ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Apps Area Review of draft-ietf-behave-lsn-requirements-05
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 07:00:02 -0000

Eliot,

>> We know CGN is quite evil device which produces many bad problems.
>>
>> I really would like to every one know that our intension is not to make
>> CGN perfect, but just finish it as a quick drug (I do not want to
>> say it is relief) as less bad as possible.
> 
> I'm not asking you to recount the whole debate.  I was asked to review
> the draft as part of the Apps Directorate.  

OK. 

> It would be grossly remiss of me to not say that this won't impact 
> applications.  It will, and in a substantial way.  
> Simon's text is acceptable to me.

I really thank you again for your kind and professional response. 
We really appreciate it.

Best wishes,

Shin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email