Re: [apps-discuss] more feature requests, was: JSON patch: "test" operation

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 04 January 2012 13:16 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6015A21F8716 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 05:16:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.772
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.772 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.173, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2tlgwmoyhXVh for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 05:16:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6639B21F85BA for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 05:16:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Jan 2012 13:09:43 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.140]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp067) with SMTP; 04 Jan 2012 14:09:43 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18+PAAuolE+DBjsEgWxXVMDaKi72xGGm3YCb52Yv8 0iaOefT5GpJsJ1
Message-ID: <4F044F93.9020307@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:09:39 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Paul C. Bryan" <paul.bryan@forgerock.com>
References: <4ED64A26.5030003@gmx.de> <BC564D94-6D00-4D63-863A-8AAD00E57B3A@tzi.org> <4ED77513.3070506@gmx.de> <6E443D75-D1AC-451F-9B17-115C9A6C7696@mnot.net> <4ED7F8C2.9030804@gmx.de> <37E09A53-E9F4-45D2-BB8F-79655BECDBB2@mnot.net> <1322779521.1958.1.camel@neutron> <4EFC8A08.7000105@gmx.de> <1325222688.18477.25.camel@neutron>
In-Reply-To: <1325222688.18477.25.camel@neutron>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] more feature requests, was: JSON patch: "test" operation
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:16:26 -0000

On 2011-12-30 06:24, Paul C. Bryan wrote:
> ...
>> 2) The ability to *copy* (not *move*) objects around.
>
> This is another example of something trivial for the patch
> implementation to perform, so I'm inclined to add it to the next draft.
> ...

...but you did not :-). Did you decide against it, or is this still on 
your TODO list?

Best regards, Julian