Re: [apps-discuss] Media type for lists of changed URIs?

Jan Algermissen <jan.algermissen@nordsc.com> Wed, 08 January 2014 16:13 UTC

Return-Path: <jan.algermissen@nordsc.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236B51AE4F1 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 08:13:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id emWcI4r818sR for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 08:13:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.8]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1D71AE4EE for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 08:13:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.90.143.216] ([87.253.171.202]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M4DQN-1VATn82D2Z-00r5bV; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 17:13:13 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Jan Algermissen <jan.algermissen@nordsc.com>
In-Reply-To: <01a301cf0c8a$19248e40$4b6daac0$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 17:13:12 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <23A6F68D-FE52-4E50-A10D-931B5A2E4093@nordsc.com>
References: <A4A8D5B5-73D7-4F4C-968A-D23337DF4FA2@nordsc.com> <CAPW_8m7OP8bG4ExEB6Dk867WJkoTgS5ODkM_-J3v0kr6zfyBuQ@mail.gmail.com> <C8613FAB-B758-44BC-A752-EBAD26D79E7A@nordsc.com> <CAPW_8m5q5hO0QjDiUx9FxU3xhc3b_Kjz3qAwWxQBi2rhJT7nQQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKioOqti423aakGfPXWtMjhYOiQ5M_LUYaXfmkfihxLt0JBZbQ@mail.gmail.com> <8825D818-4526-471C-8E60-5EC8DD292162@nordsc.com> <01a301cf0c8a$19248e40$4b6daac0$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:f5GJeOFxS93VCLmrhqtH7VjSj5AJES3SBAY6rUaxY2V /fi4Y5TcMHCoTSEwepNKPbaCc27JWVWaQycVZMoZ9I6P5mLhRQ bDC5asNN/YY5sS9y45aOskUkNGCT+plUG2NmKxmZFSFdyjvAMv B0qg2DwJtCoWw5xq7J7QyBlngq6JQprMkzHvdSLve3xIPSUBeZ FlCAnvfM9tB+I/9YP57O+J1XYMegAgijo14IuPPkLxHA0s2iXp dV7fRFi3TEaaqOVjPC+4sPQeJolIJccxRf5PBgtGuA+hFHDtnE eu6Hrw3o1WI8xnuAVTVl7ZUObodgHpOsmesE0XsYuMClbfVJZA b3h6woAlbSo2KjotZcvggE3A5GChEAj8OwEnmNyeX2iyE6HsPw SUTok6I1xbkvg==
Cc: darrel@tavis.ca, 'IETF Apps Discuss' <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Media type for lists of changed URIs?
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 16:13:28 -0000

On 08.01.2014, at 16:55, "Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote:

> On Wednesday, January 08, 2014 4:38 PM, Jan Algermissen wrote:
>> I want to avoid the situation where the client needs to understand the
>> URI structure of the 'update-event' pages, e.g.
>> 
>> /items/changes/2013/01/01/01
>> /items/changes/2013/01/01/...
>> /items/changes/2013/01/01/24
>> /items/changes/2013/02/01/01
>> /items/changes/2013/02/01/...
>> /items/changes/2013/02/01/24
> 
> Why do you need the timestamp in the URL *list*? Can't you just iterate
> until you find a URL the client already knows?

Resources can be updated anytime, so I might miss something if I just look for URIs.
Jan


> You could also use HTTP's
> Last-Modified header to get the timestamp (but that would probably be very
> inefficient).
> 
> 
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
>