[apps-discuss] http-auth problem statement draft

Yutaka OIWA <y.oiwa@aist.go.jp> Tue, 05 July 2011 14:10 UTC

Return-Path: <y.oiwa@aist.go.jp>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2808221F8575; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 07:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.09
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P0eoV0qEBJGZ; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 07:10:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp (mx1.aist.go.jp []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4FB721F8579; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 07:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp []) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p65EAXhe028839; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 23:10:33 +0900 (JST) env-from (y.oiwa@aist.go.jp)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=aist.go.jp; s=aist; t=1309875034; bh=lWQopefAxXp1v8Gj10NThaRecdYPKaMpSBH//1Hj9CY=; h=From:Date:Message-ID; b=cv2SwYkrx+yiZFi+986DQbzMET2zsmeWCM1veVLdoZ0hQDC6fnA3RvDfipROq3SJo aVQ0QOPv/7n1Hz2EWGohSmuXFC2qcaEq/l1Jzn507NhTBbw3BSk3NRnvOTJ5ISn8UQ tFyQxXMK/khr8pqF/NHcxf2kbc6AI6aw45Y3KAJ8=
Received: from smtp3.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p65EAXhS002618; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 23:10:33 +0900 (JST) env-from (y.oiwa@aist.go.jp)
Received: by smtp3.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p65EAWg1014010; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 23:10:32 +0900 (JST) env-from (y.oiwa@aist.go.jp)
To: IETF HTTP-auth Mailing List <http-auth@ietf.org>
From: Yutaka OIWA <y.oiwa@aist.go.jp>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 23:10:32 +0900
Message-ID: <87box824yv.fsf@bluewind.rcis.aist.go.jp>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: saag <saag@ietf.org>, apps-discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: [apps-discuss] http-auth problem statement draft
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: IETF HTTP-auth Mailing List <http-auth@ietf.org>
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 14:10:42 -0000

Dear all,

I have just reformatted the problem statement document
(previously put on IETF Wiki) to the I-D format.

The draft is now available from:


I've added categorization of use-cases to three groups (Section 4).
I also added several references and other minor improvements.

I'd like to add more topics and use cases here.


Yutaka OIWA, Ph.D.                                       Research Scientist
                            Research Center for Information Security (RCIS)
    National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)
                      Mail addresses: <y.oiwa@aist.go.jp>jp>, <yutaka@oiwa.jp>
OpenPGP: id[440546B5] fp[7C9F 723A 7559 3246 229D  3139 8677 9BD2 4405 46B5]