Re: [apps-discuss] Request for Review - draft-yevstifeyev-rlogin-uri-00

[Paul Hoffman <[e-mail]>]

On 2/3/11 8:20 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
> 03.02.2011 17:05, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> On 2/3/11 6:53 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
>>> 03.02.2011 16:39, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>>>> On 2/3/11 2:32 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>
>>>>> In accordance with RFC 4395 I'm asking to review the
>>>>> draft-yevstifeyev-rlogin-uri-00, that can be found here:
>>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yevstifeyev-rlogin-uri-00
>>>>>
>>>>> This document specifies the 'rlogin' URI scheme. The Rlogin
>>>>> protocol is
>>>>> defined in RFC 1282.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your time,
>>>>> Mykyta Yevstifeyev
>>>>>
>>>>> P.S. I've also posted such message on uri-review list. Mykyta
>>>>
>>>> This seems like another waste of time.
>>> I do not know why do you think so - Rlogin is quite widely-used
>>> alternative for Telnet on Unix systems.
>>
>> Mykyta: do you read the responses to your earlier drafts? If you do,
>> you would in fact know why I think so. It is the same reason as I and
>> others have said the same thing about most/all your other proposals.
>> If you don't read the responses, then I would very much encourage you
>> to stop posting to any IETF WG lists: they are supposed to be
>> discussions, not one-way announcements.
> If something appears for one proposal, it is not sure this will be said
> about the other one. My right - to propose; yours - to accept or decline.

Of course. But you said that you did not know why I thought this was a 
waste of time. If you had read earlier responses from me and many other 
members of the IETF community, you would have known that.