IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme

"t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com> Sat, 03 December 2011 18:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD0421F8F5D for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Dec 2011 10:42:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.554
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.445, BAYES_05=-1.11]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b3aLpWPfqf05 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Dec 2011 10:42:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.btconnect.com (c2beaomr09.btconnect.com [213.123.26.187]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 478EC21F8ECE for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Dec 2011 10:42:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from host86-177-208-97.range86-177.btcentralplus.com (HELO pc6) ([86.177.208.97]) by c2beaomr09.btconnect.com with SMTP id FKO77456; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 18:42:00 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <022001ccb1e3$1b8cb300$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, "Mykyta Yevstifeyev (?. ?????????)" <evnikita2@gmail.com>
References: <4EC16815.80501@gmail.com> <4EC1D4C1.7080406@isode.com><4EC40EC3.9080304@gmail.com><CAC4RtVB4Y2ozbBs=n1hwCMdvv-YinhLiGFGgwt4R=a7-8iyYmA@mail.gmail.com><4ED9B441.2020507@gmail.com> <CALaySJLK3Qeoisair-C=TpT=RDh05WVroF5GCZ9w+jBiiQKqTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 18:22:56 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=Fair-1, source=Queried, refid=tid=0001.0A0B0302.4EDA6D78.0037, actions=tag
X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=7/50, refid=2.7.2:2011.12.3.180017:17:7.586, ip=86.177.208.97, rules=__HAS_MSGID, __OUTLOOK_MSGID_1, __SANE_MSGID, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, CT_TP_8859_1, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI, __HAS_X_MAILER, USER_AGENT_OE, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __ANY_URI, __FRAUD_BODY_WEBMAIL, __URI_NO_WWW, __URI_NO_PATH, __INT_PROD_COMP, BODY_SIZE_600_699, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC, __OUTLOOK_MUA, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS, RDNS_SUSP, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS
X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=c2beaomr09.btconnect.com
X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0B0208.4EDA6D78.011E, ss=1, re=0.000, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2011-07-25 19:15:43, dmn=2011-05-27 18:58:46, mode=multiengine
X-Junkmail-IWF: false
Cc: Apps-discuss list <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 18:42:06 -0000

---- Original Message ----- 
From: "Barry Leiba" <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: "Mykyta Yevstifeyev (?. ?????????)" <evnikita2@gmail.com>
Cc: "Apps-discuss list" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2011 3:28 PM
I think there are only two minor things left to respond to here:

I suggest that we either use <apps-discuss@ietf.org> or
<uri-review@ietf.org>, and I'm not sure which one is right.  Perhaps
others on apps-discuss, or perhaps the ADs, will comment.

<tp>

apps-discuss has the support, procedures, the archives and so on
which I find ... well, supportive.

Tom Petch

</tp>

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status