[apps-discuss] draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp into APPSAWG?

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Mon, 14 November 2011 01:56 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2752D11E8082 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 17:56:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.806
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.806 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.208, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xp5VXH52cjKr for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 17:56:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ht2-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht2-outbound.cloudmark.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6417021F8510 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 17:56:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([]) by spite.corp.cloudmark.com ([]) with mapi; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 17:56:51 -0800
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 17:56:50 -0800
Thread-Topic: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp into APPSAWG?
Thread-Index: AcyicKz1WilxOxrqQziE0yZx+SjG6w==
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C15000@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C15000EXCHC2corpclo_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [apps-discuss] draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp into APPSAWG?
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 01:56:53 -0000

Hi all,

As discussed in the APPSAWG meeting just now, I'd like to see if there's interest in adopting this into APPSAWG for processing.  There wasn't any resistance, but a few people provided the following useful input towards its development:

-          Should it be BCP or Informational?

-          It should discuss how not to do greylisting as well as how to do it

-          Some collaboration with the ASRG is suggested in terms of collecting data about which approaches work best, etc.

And of course the main question is: Is this appropriate for APPSAWG?