Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] [tsvwg] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-16
From: S Moonesamy <[email-masked]>
To: "Black, David" <[email-masked]>, [email-masked], Lars Eggert <[email-masked]>, Godred Fairhurst <[email-masked]>, Greg Shepherd <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 21:11:16 -0700
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>

Hi David,
At 20:59 22-08-2016, Black, David wrote:
>I guess that begs the definition of "intended for the Internet" - if such an
>application has complete knowledge of the network path or paths involved
>it could know that there is provisioned QoS.  That's a specialized case, but
>it is possible.

Thanks for responding to the review.  I consider the review as addressed.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy