IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Call for Adoption: draft-wilde-xml-patch

James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Mon, 20 May 2013 20:27 UTC

Return-Path: <jasnell@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6677321F962D for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2013 13:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fr0eKlyu8lBd for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2013 13:27:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x229.google.com (mail-ob0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B3421F9408 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 May 2013 13:27:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id vb8so7633194obc.0 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 May 2013 13:27:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=NjZCWD250k7F/I58487YcoEIzGtpWYlLxs7ZaMULvGI=; b=Fd5oeN2vXui/f+ny4QG5DByifclW3qP+ClfTYb7Cq/HzFOtRl2jjYTLmDhlSOLPVTn BOFjSbg8GwjCaopTYi5YI7GzN2BIY9ElSvPqIp2BYGvGHyL9vt1TBbfkpYCF19CwlGIT H/annmjw1XKI5Istt4tiv8akXaBomkfKmCDyC04amfK+tuR6mcrIfE2f+Zd2HNulGfXR QzWsmhdMeFKyjjJYhSFM91P0YNWS8JaRKYPDGpLd7bN77gvKYYA6J1m8Upn8V3FlJ90B RzZ2//JshDSuD1irwSLcQUw8IGUGQi8ZLQQC3D9APIrdiMLTqTeIrgblGHzkAXWbEjv9 LpDg==
X-Received: by 10.60.80.103 with SMTP id q7mr17077201oex.135.1369081665922; Mon, 20 May 2013 13:27:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.3.137 with HTTP; Mon, 20 May 2013 13:27:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwY8NYbTDr8xYJCr-DokJ25jkAowuzWSDNODiJP2FHFbng@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwYKGE-YXrZ0MzD3UwPiRUEOo93hwBZm88i6-8Q_rW2sKA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwY8NYbTDr8xYJCr-DokJ25jkAowuzWSDNODiJP2FHFbng@mail.gmail.com>
From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 13:27:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CABP7RbcYOp+5_VHzvgQvvSfOcNxMjfSeq0p7FP9tJ+OtRm0AWw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Call for Adoption: draft-wilde-xml-patch
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 20:27:50 -0000

I'm +0.5 on this really. It makes sense to process this through as a
WG doc given the how it fits with other related docs, but I'm not
convinced yet just how extensively this will be implemented. Perhaps
we ought to just let this one sit for a while and see if interest
picks up?

On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy
<superuser@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> This is a call for adoption for draft-wilde-xml-patch.  The document had a
>> thread of discussion in January that showed some interest within this
>> working group, and it appears to be material that falls within our charter.
>> Accordingly, we'll adopt this as a working group item within the next couple
>> of weeks unless there's objection to such processing.  I will act as
>> document shepherd.
>>
>
> I've not seen any traffic in support of this in the last couple of weeks.  I
> realize my message was a "default yes" and thus people may not have felt the
> need to respond.  However, in retrospect, there was exactly one person other
> than the author that participated in that January thread.  I'm not certain
> now whether we have critical mass to justify processing it here.
>
> Does anyone (other than Erik and Tom) support processing it through appsawg?
>
> -MSK
>
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email