Re: [apps-discuss] Call for Adoption: draft-kucherawy-received-state-02.txt

Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com> Fri, 27 April 2012 02:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4BFB11E8079 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7zMBKtoudWZc for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [66.59.230.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D778511E8096 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01OESA7C4ZPC000C7P@mauve.mrochek.com> for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01OENEYWYFI80006TF@mauve.mrochek.com>; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-id: <01OESA7AW0OK0006TF@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:08:56 -0700
From: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Wed, 25 Apr 2012 05:23:17 +0000" <20120425052317.77243.qmail@joyce.lan>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN
References: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E003928100E82@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <20120425052317.77243.qmail@joyce.lan>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Call for Adoption: draft-kucherawy-received-state-02.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 02:11:24 -0000

> >> Please indicate your support or objection, and opinions thereto before
> >> the close of business on May 1st.

> I have my doubts about the utility of this feature, but it is at worst
> harmless so it's fine to publish it.  The quality of the draft is good,
> didn't see anything that needed to change.

I think there's some utility here - additional trace information is almost
always a good thing - but even ore important is breaking the impasse
that has prevent extensions to Received:. This seems as good a document as
any to do it.

So: +1 to this becoming a WG draft.

				Ned