IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation-00.txt

Bjartur Thorlacius <svartman95@gmail.com> Sat, 02 July 2011 12:34 UTC

Return-Path: <svartman95@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F84711E834E; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 05:34:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id piCgcswhJ88Z; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 05:34:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C9B911E832D; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 05:34:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wyj26 with SMTP id 26so3078265wyj.31 for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 05:34:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8uW+OB7f37A2KU+4mJAXxPFU7QuDjsEyvnrxbd+iaOU=; b=OJ1duNBI1LrNMqrTI7nsLPUfQreRH52xtB5BTpOoYEOX8eED0MRiM5ph7CytLEiSsk 2LwwZk6nS8QuuZsZRnQohroiA/BuAi3zN80nintCttMiuO3tKCTvotcs81pKf3GAiDV4 j4VGYf0yg+aVYZ3uzBGbQo9XZT4VHjrXXzMTE=
Received: by 10.227.183.143 with SMTP id cg15mr3835885wbb.24.1309610075622; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 05:34:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.64] (85-220-65-176.dsl.dynamic.simnet.is [85.220.65.176]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id et5sm2983334wbb.50.2011.07.02.05.34.33 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 02 Jul 2011 05:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E0F1058.3050201@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 12:34:32 +0000
From: Bjartur Thorlacius <svartman95@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
References: <4E083D3F.6030200@gmx.de> <4E0D3EA5.7010803@gmail.com> <4E0DCFEF.20206@gmx.de> <4E0DEA77.3050007@gmail.com> <4E0E0E76.2080007@gmail.com> <4E0E995A.7060800@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E0E995A.7060800@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 13:29:59 -0700
Cc: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, "link-relations@ietf.org" <link-relations@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation-00.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 12:35:20 -0000

Þann lau  2.júl 2011 04:06, skrifaði Mykyta Yevstifeyev:
> First, this was an example only. Next, my point was that the document
> makes HTTP/'http' scheme mandatory in context/target URIs, which I don't
> think is appropriate, since canonical URI may refer to a resource
> accessible via other protocol. Even though HTTP is going to be the most
> often use case of canonical link relation, we shouldn't exclude other
> protocols.
I agree. However, I don't understand the need for forbidding canonical 
links to resources with multiple representations. Are there not to be 
canonical links from representations of a resource to the resource (i.e. 
from /spec.html and /spec.txt to /spec)?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email