Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-08.txt

Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org> Fri, 22 April 2016 08:47 UTC

Return-Path: <gk@ninebynine.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF9D12D8A1 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 01:47:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2IP3jva_mNOW for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 01:47:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay13.mail.ox.ac.uk (relay13.mail.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.166]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6204112EA70 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 01:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp4.mail.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.207]) by relay13.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <gk@ninebynine.org>) id 1atWkG-0007tO-i2; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 09:47:24 +0100
Received: from oerc-dynamic-195.oerc.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.194.195]) by smtp4.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <gk@ninebynine.org>) id 1atWkG-0000Q2-ES; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 09:47:24 +0100
Message-ID: <5719E51E.1030809@ninebynine.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 09:47:26 +0100
From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
References: <20160422072202.7666.57137.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CACweHNAgptW7ss_b6qfPZT-_+Pikp=1AUL5vuBfHRbk_WJE3dQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACweHNAgptW7ss_b6qfPZT-_+Pikp=1AUL5vuBfHRbk_WJE3dQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Oxford-Username: zool0635
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/axpvxd19xfyvL2yz2wNQcj8RSUU>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-08.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 08:47:37 -0000

Checking: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-08

The new text in section 3 looks good to me.

#g
--

On 22/04/2016 08:35, Matthew Kerwin wrote:
> Here's another revision, this time with a much smaller diff. It changes
> around the meaning of the 'host' as per Graham's advice to mean what it did
> in RFC 1738 and 1630.
>
> I've kept the 'host' syntax rule even though it's explicitly a FQDN (better
> served by the 'reg-name' rule), because it's always been 'host'. Hopefully
> that's not controversial.
>
> The other TODOs still remain, and I'll try to work on them over the weekend
> or early next week.
>
> Cheers
>
> On 22 April 2016 at 17:22, <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the ART Area General Applications Working
>> Group of the IETF.
>>
>>          Title           : The file URI Scheme
>>          Author          : Matthew Kerwin
>>          Filename        : draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-08.txt
>>          Pages           : 19
>>          Date            : 2016-04-22
>>
>> Abstract:
>>     This document specifies the "file" Uniform Resource Identifier (URI)
>>     scheme, obsoleting the definition in RFC 1738.
>>
>>     It defines a common syntax which is intended to interoperate across
>>     the broad spectrum of existing usages.  At the same time it notes
>>     some other current practices around the use of file URIs.
>>
>> Note to Readers (To be removed by the RFC Editor)
>>
>>     This draft should be discussed on the IETF Applications Area Working
>>     Group discussion list <apps-discuss@ietf.org>rg>.
>>
>>
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme/
>>
>> There's also a htmlized version available at:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-08
>>
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-08
>>
>>
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>> submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> apps-discuss mailing list
>> apps-discuss@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>>
>
>
>