IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00 and our lawn -- feedback?

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 13 February 2014 05:24 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 902D61A00F5 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 21:24:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.357
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.357 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 95BFOwpM-eUl for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 21:24:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1821A00EF for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 21:24:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 99231 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2014 05:24:46 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent:cleverness; s=1839e.52fc571e.k1402; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=VdyP8xZYYmitx2NIGs/FQvgOZVkBvoRsW6cQAr4Wh3Q=; b=hKtegmM8QGnzXICQOBFkO5M+oQL7Rl1prZ+PiTCLLCBszv+DW3LclmofHNiGe3sF03DC/mEdY8V9FJ5Lt3iXrN+yG6dnGES4ntn1AcDsbeopeOtRtEEiy8lcFZzowtbEMoxDfrtupDrvFImkcNgR3PQtHQUbo5YeS87y6DDYH4dRrnO5MV1eS/Xp90/EUfiQfipdS1iUxPrbZ8PEoEOvNuB3LmvP9yDLAfJLZqVWHZoSF+9dY7u+Rsv48+3oArY/
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent:cleverness; s=1839e.52fc571e.k1402; olt=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=VdyP8xZYYmitx2NIGs/FQvgOZVkBvoRsW6cQAr4Wh3Q=; b=ObGHWOkxNiXuXtVakVSKBQA4rKXyZf1rRKwtf9uzuGgCnxprypbMuBenXjveUSHc/2XfYkI+Fu7yhTN2S254L2GZJKv19VtwWciGoaygo3vvAXMm8gB2BosC/jZd/Zw9OEjPIwGLXKV3tzlfR98ms/nORY4XKd7RLNtvgvUSzCNfKHH9+4I6yNYVzm7hjWOwU8iqASLsbuFlwrej2hOwdQncDPHml6axfPtLcPGDPzcGH0OIsrUI7fgFRZ9qLlXd
Received: from [10.1.152.209] ([207.236.136.66]) by nimap.iecc.com ([64.57.183.76]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP; 13 Feb 2014 05:24:45 -0000
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:24:45 -0500
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1402130023310.2177@joyce.lan>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <B1C114F7-5FA4-49F7-880F-9E94FCB24BFA@mnot.net>
References: <20140211223250.68983.qmail@joyce.lan> <B1C114F7-5FA4-49F7-880F-9E94FCB24BFA@mnot.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
Cleverness: None detected
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00 and our lawn -- feedback?
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 05:24:49 -0000

> It's this attitude that I (and apparently other Web folks here) find disturbing -- to paraphrase, "we're building a new protocol, so we don't have to worry about what we do to the Web."

I have no interest in breaking the web, but honestly, so far all I've seen 
is FUD.  Can you offer a plausible scenario where RDAP would break 
something?

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email