Re: [apps-discuss] font/*

"Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Wed, 09 November 2011 01:13 UTC

Return-Path: <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F84511E8095 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 17:13:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.558
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.558 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.232, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vtJmC5Ez4grs for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 17:13:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584BA21F85A4 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 17:13:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.253.231]) by scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id pA91Co2e022527 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 10:12:50 +0900
Received: from (unknown [133.2.206.133]) by scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 5912_1291_f16f20fe_0a6f_11e1_bbef_001d096c5782; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 10:12:50 +0900
Received: from [IPv6:::1] ([133.2.210.1]:34924) by itmail.it.aoyama.ac.jp with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id <S156AC6C> for <apps-discuss@ietf.org> from <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 10:12:54 +0900
Message-ID: <4EB9D383.1060901@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 10:12:35 +0900
From: =?UTF-8?B?Ik1hcnRpbiBKLiBEw7xyc3Qi?= <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <4EB86078.8070904@stpeter.im> <4EB8E7FA.5030406@ninebynine.org> <CAC4RtVA-33Sv8UqhL7feXX0h90KZF+rL0_iG1DimRp-MY-r0tg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVA-33Sv8UqhL7feXX0h90KZF+rL0_iG1DimRp-MY-r0tg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] font/*
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 01:13:02 -0000

On 2011/11/09 7:53, Barry Leiba wrote:
>> It's not clear to me what purpose would be served that cannot be handled
>> perfectly adequately by application/*
>
> This was my first thought as well.
>
> But then I thought again, and I said, "Gee: that's always true.  If we
> always think that, then wouldn't *everything* just be
> 'application/<something>'?  And then what would the point of top-level
> types be in the first place?"
>
> We have the precedent, as it's set up in the first place, to say,
> "This is text," and "This is audio," and "This is an image," and "This
> is video."  It seems to me that, "This is a font definition," is as
> much a statement of a distinct media type as the others are.

Very well put!

Regards,   Martin.