Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback on draft-moonesamy-smtp-ipv6-00

Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com> Tue, 15 November 2011 19:40 UTC

Return-Path: <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E851F0C75 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:40:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.189, BAYES_00=-2.599, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JfvX6Xj108aK for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:40:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D44331F0C4B for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:40:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wyf28 with SMTP id 28so6434794wyf.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:40:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=q9kyoJU+fwASg0LtfohPvnX2lJMdMn9NJLAOJpQ4yyE=; b=cqjyuKc/Xphp8SD7WBOPoQAO7qilfy2agtWxNkz6R7cFPinJ/vwW/jwnJmQ3I8Zs2L sc0XOoLw2nHrJyggzyAoApHdU7FMSwcIOJGMlCVY7UcL7Uyp0A/1DYUctU8ncRecOUWN W7ShBSGwxMzIvUUsy/Cok6XrMrjx6GT2x7xgA=
Received: by 10.216.139.83 with SMTP id b61mr5052082wej.73.1321386027057; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:40:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.184.147 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:39:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1111151925030.30178@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <20111115025746.26808.qmail@joyce.lan> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1111151057160.5322@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1111151903240.41620@joyce.lan> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1111151108140.30178@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CAHhFybr3OyhE310J8-iYGsY4h4Y=QaLisaFd761L64_w4_CcJw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1111151925030.30178@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
From: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:39:45 +0100
Message-ID: <CAHhFybp+tt-KD12Kx1OxUPf12rsM_=MK0nBkr_+=q7SGkwyMXA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback on draft-moonesamy-smtp-ipv6-00
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:40:28 -0000

On 15 November 2011 20:25, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> wrote:

>> It would be nice to have both, an official STD 10 fresher than 821,
>> and an informational companion obsoleting 3974 with the dual stack
>> example.

> WRT sual stack, what is missing from section 5 of RFC 5321?

The simple step-by-step "how to" is missing, or rather, because 5321
is already long enough I don't miss it _in_ RFC 5321.  But I'd like
an external text with "ESMTP IPv6 considerations" not limited to the
3974 business.

-Frank