[apps-discuss] Revising Full Standards

Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com> Mon, 24 January 2011 09:16 UTC

Return-Path: <evnikita2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8143A6827 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 01:16:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.949
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.350, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ut3tC8CbKYeO for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 01:16:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com (mail-yx0-f172.google.com []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C183A63EB for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 01:16:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by yxt33 with SMTP id 33so1408825yxt.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 01:19:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=vsY+WOo1Ztpf4cUe+RZVEs0PB8jQCBY45FBfi+VIv94=; b=QPTzG7CiUWssqbeQ1/nE7HIKSYVD7ZzhpG+b5xQQC9whiLcXX1wN+dxkTTWuhMvx8n zaj8aXqCnaGiTKmTlXhgTcJfXhH+wcKd1vym/BHSUL8RerblW7NNMaLWk+nJSByubR7c VHZoZWQGn5wbe8t6rzbBsvUkWfaYKEkZcRmgA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=IbaQgSxuQhLmOmDI3B6rwp+S9+uVZn31XMwDAIVhbm9NpjLzVaxrFe+w1xZDEswozg yxKGimVPduawmnjxDqiELB/ybSLZdjaB7U2lCIKe7NSsi6fD2GyD+D0lbfFJsNwR8MoP eVkdWzFzjUd0tE1SLuxHTmWzGhCpqjGfu2sbQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by with SMTP id u18mr223909ybj.269.1295860779193; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 01:19:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with HTTP; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 01:19:39 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:19:39 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTimrGi0xHoypn=UX2=C-MtFoX6RzvUhVx49DdE_w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: [apps-discuss] Revising Full Standards
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:16:46 -0000

Hello all,

There are a number of Full Standards (STD20-26), that, IMO, need
revsising.  Firstly, all of these documents define the protocols only
for TCP and UDP, and that might be useful to define them for such
protocols, as DCCP or SCTP.  Moreover, in spite of being the Full
Standards, it does not meet the current practices and view of Internet

So I'd like to ask whether making docs to obsolete these standards
make any sense?  Or it would be OK just to update the corresponding
dosuments for DCCP and SCTP?

All the best,
Mykyta Yevstifeyev