[apps-discuss] Revising Full Standards

Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com> Mon, 24 January 2011 09:16 UTC

DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=IbaQgSxuQhLmOmDI3B6rwp+S9+uVZn31XMwDAIVhbm9NpjLzVaxrFe+w1xZDEswozg yxKGimVPduawmnjxDqiELB/ybSLZdjaB7U2lCIKe7NSsi6fD2GyD+D0lbfFJsNwR8MoP eVkdWzFzjUd0tE1SLuxHTmWzGhCpqjGfu2sbQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:19:39 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTimrGi0xHoypn=UX2=C-MtFoX6RzvUhVx49DdE_w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: [apps-discuss] Revising Full Standards
Precedence: list

Hello all,

There are a number of Full Standards (STD20-26), that, IMO, need
revsising.  Firstly, all of these documents define the protocols only
for TCP and UDP, and that might be useful to define them for such
protocols, as DCCP or SCTP.  Moreover, in spite of being the Full
Standards, it does not meet the current practices and view of Internet
Standards.

So I'd like to ask whether making docs to obsolete these standards
make any sense?  Or it would be OK just to update the corresponding
dosuments for DCCP and SCTP?

All the best,
Mykyta Yevstifeyev

[apps-discuss] Revising Full Standards Mykyta Yevstifeyev
Re: [apps-discuss] Revising Full Standards Alexey Melnikov