Re: [apps-discuss] Review of draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme

[Sean Leonard <[e-mail]>]

On 5/14/2016 10:26 PM, Matthew Kerwin wrote:
>
>
> On 13 May 2016 at 23:05, Dave Crocker <[e-mail] 
> <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>
>     On 5/13/2016 12:05 AM, Matthew Kerwin wrote:
>
>         4. Encoding
>
>         File systems use various encoding schemes to store file and
>         directory
>         names.
>
>
>
>     Just to be particularly picky, since the text is about name
>     encoding and not, for example, content encoding, I suggest the
>     title be
>
>        4. File Name Encoding
>
>     d/
>
>
> ​Fair enough. I've published this version, with the cut down text and 
> the new section name, as -09 so people can view it in the whole or 
> using the diff tools.

In the picky vein, Section 4 should be called
4. Path Encoding

Since we are talking about the whole path (including the host), not just 
file names; "path" is a well-defined computing term and the draft itself 
uses it. (But not really the fragment, which is not part of the path.) 
The text of Section 4 does not need to be changed.

Best regards,

Sean