Re: [apps-discuss] Malformed mail (was Re: Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail-03)

Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com> Mon, 08 July 2013 07:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0161C11E81A9 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 00:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QcklCSh0Ng+z for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 00:31:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [66.59.230.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C638411E81A3 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 00:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01OVR2JXDVHC009NBO@mauve.mrochek.com> for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 00:26:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=iso-8859-1
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01OVLZJ0QSGW000054@mauve.mrochek.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 00:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
Message-id: <01OVR2JVAQIA000054@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 00:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Mon, 08 Jul 2013 00:20:16 -0700" <CAL0qLwbUiFh3XcTm=BZJg3NCXtU8N+8v-6jw7Wq7q_TChbMV7Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwaBPhyPEKHPwRurqoCnNy2_tp6rCHe7YzvPonvfN_ALHQ@mail.gmail.com> <20130513153932.91355.qmail@joyce.lan> <01OVBCWUMFA0007PSE@mauve.mrochek.com> <CAL0qLwbUiFh3XcTm=BZJg3NCXtU8N+8v-6jw7Wq7q_TChbMV7Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Malformed mail (was Re: Review of: draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail-03)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 07:31:35 -0000

> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com> wrote:

> > In regards to malformed message, I just ran into one containing, among
> > other
> > things, the following fields:
> >
> > Received: from 1.2.3.4 @ host user@host
> > Received: from 4.5.6. user@host
> > Return-Path: user@host "phrase"
> > Content-Type: text/plain
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 9-bit
> > Content-Type: text/plain
> > MIME Ver: 1.40
> >
> > (I have of course anonymized things.)
> >
> > Of course I've seen plenty of broken messages, but this is taking things
> > to a whole new level.
> >
> >
> >
> Should any or all of these be mentioned in the draft, or is this just
> fodder for general head-shaking?  :-)

I sincerely hope it's the latter.

				Ned