IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] [saag] [websec] [kitten] HTTP authentication: the next generation

Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> Sun, 19 December 2010 21:48 UTC

Return-Path: <benl@google.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB043A6904 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:48:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.371
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.371 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-4.607, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, SARE_OBFU_MILLIONS=1.213, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xyLpdyV5YU9u for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:48:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [74.125.121.67]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED1F63A68FD for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:48:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wpaz9.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz9.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.73]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id oBJLnve9001913 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:49:58 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1292795398; bh=uWfAZT2M3FpdI4YhLUhCaX5+M+w=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=OD1uee4PbeTNIzspa9tXpfqfld3OoNVEeo9VJpa48wXtODEiONuRIfoOimAhPwD/q YndRSlESn9E7uh84txA4A==
Received: from qwj8 (qwj8.prod.google.com [10.241.195.72]) by wpaz9.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id oBJLnuKT009879 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:49:56 -0800
Received: by qwj8 with SMTP id 8so2364982qwj.10 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:49:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MfXLHtS0HhUmrdwYRuE7bZ/eaVoK3BSZWCEkYhNpwsM=; b=RS5mloI+ufvR0ZaoyqZrPac8GNuGrEPoI57fwDihC+87Dj4AEkALfT8JXCW5yfAdIp ccynlurtA78G5JQuY/Ww==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=jEZ4eidTTY/ulcVKzn0G7Y5AUrzK1L8k2PDf1jp/J1txMZwtXuRzacanp9VZi89s0d NVl9hMudenCxuH3MfY+w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.81.12 with SMTP id v12mr3084026qck.35.1292795396286; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:49:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.126.219 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:49:56 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4D0DE882.50201@qbik.com>
References: <4D02AF81.6000907@stpeter.im> <p06240809c928635499e8@10.20.30.150> <ADDEC353-8DE6-408C-BC75-A50B795E2F6C@checkpoint.com> <78BD0B98-0F20-478B-85F1-DBB45691EB0D@padl.com> <4D0479E3.4050508@gmail.com> <4D04D7D6.4090105@isode.com> <A23730A9-728B-4533-96D7-0B62496CC98A@checkpoint.com> <4D051731.1020400@isode.com> <4D054041.7010203@cisco.com> <0435D11C-DF55-464D-B23F-F5D114DEE2C3@checkpoint.com> <2229.1292235952.971571@puncture> <4D05FB8F.3070804@qbik.com> <2229.1292239384.281779@puncture> <96517E19-5DC7-47A0-8C21-C710F6F8F772@tzi.org> <2229.1292253372.639419@puncture> <AANLkTi=iGWnBtOgPhN9tRtaJTxQhvRkjq3p0UCkRdT8=@mail.gmail.com> <4D0DE882.50201@qbik.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 21:49:56 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=oscrJbRM2coa1+bZFB6W8t5vKcmEMGpDPvrf9@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
To: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:30:38 -0800
Cc: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, websec <websec@ietf.org>, Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten@ietf.org>, "http-auth@ietf.org" <http-auth@ietf.org>, "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] [saag] [websec] [kitten] HTTP authentication: the next generation
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 21:48:08 -0000

On 19 December 2010 11:12, Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com> wrote:
> Imagine if
> everyone needed a client certificate to send any mail.  We'd have no spam.

Nonsense. We'd just restrict spam to owned machines, of which there
are only a few tens or hundreds of milliions, if we're lucky.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email